![]() I have many duplicates but using Duplicate Annihilator is tricky and it's difficult to be certain I'm not deleting the original full size image.Īttached is a screenshot showing the path of one photo, for example. ![]() My photos are a huge mess with files being located in so many different places I cannot begin to find them. I may even get rid of my MAC and go back to Windows - I'm too old to figure out UNIX no matter how great it is. I want to start over with a different photo organizer - hate iPhoto. I cannot accomplish my goal with that method unless I sit here for the next ten years. Using File/Open/Media/Photos will not allow me to delete files but only lets me open the file in iPhoto. jpg files came up with only the images NOT in iPhoto! IPhoto says I have >40,000 photos but in reality there are probably only 15,000? Duplicate Annihilator is too tricky to use. jpg files on my iMAC then select the many duplicate ones I wish to delete by viewing them in a finder-type window showing columns for filename, date, file size, and path. ![]() This is described in Section 23.3.2.4 of SystemVerilog IEEE Std 1800-2012.GOAL: I want to find all the original. subcomponent subcomponent_instance_name ( It is not obvious when new ports have been added and are missing or that they might accidentally get connected if the new port name had a counter part in the instancing level, they get auto connected and no warning would be generated. I consider this to be quite dangerous in production code. * which connects unmentioned ports to signals of the same wire. This is described in Section 23.3.2.3 of SystemVerilog IEEE Std 1800-2012.Īnother trick that I think is even worse than the one above is. This can look neat especially with lots of clk and resets but at some levels you may generate different clocks or resets or you actually do not want to connect to the signal of the same name but a modified one and this can lead to wiring bugs that are not obvious to the eye. port with no brackets to connect to a wire/reg of the same name. I believe that they hinder the code readability and can make it harder to find bugs. Moving to SystemVerilog there are a few tricks available that save typing a handful of characters. I would recommend that all connectivity wires be explicitly written out. The connectivity wire needs to be created and a width specified. The issue with the above code is that data_temp is only 1 bit wide, there would be a compile warning about port width mismatch. Subcomponent subcomponent_instance_name2 ( Note that the instance name for the second component has been changed subcomponent subcomponent_instance_name ( An example where this is a problem would be for the data: it will only ever create a 1 bit wire by default. ![]() This nominally works as a wire for clk_sub is automatically created, there is a danger to relying on this. What happens if we are to take outputs from one component to another: clk_gen( So far all the connections that have been made have reused inputs and output to the sub module and no connectivity wires have been created. Giving each port its own line and indenting correctly adds to the readability and code quality. This is described in Section 23.3.2.2 of SystemVerilog IEEE Std 1800-2012. It is therefore recommended to connect using named ports, this also helps tracing connectivity of wires in the code. There will be no connectivity issue from your compiler but will not work as intended. for example if some one else fixs a bug and reorders the ports for some reason, switching the clk and reset order. simple refactoring here can break connectivity or change behaviour. This has a few draw backs especially regarding the port order of the subcomponent code. This is described in Section 23.3.2.1 of SystemVerilog IEEE Std 1800-2012. Subcomponent subcomponent_instance_name ( The simplest way is to instantiate in the main section of top, creating a named instance and wiring the ports up in order: module top( This is all generally covered by Section 23.3.2 of SystemVerilog IEEE Std 1800-2012.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |